Toward a Better, Healthier, More Life-Giving Faith

Share

These days, the word “Christian” seems to evoke as many negative reactions as it does positive ones.

This bothers me.

Does it bother you?

Critics might summarize their feelings about Christians with these words attributed to Mahatma Gandhi: “I like your Christ, but I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”

More recently, San Francisco journalist Herb Caen said, “The trouble with born-again Christians is that they are an even bigger pain the second time around.”

Painfully, and from the vantage point of a Christian convert who had become disenchanted with her church, Vampire Chronicles author Anne Rice wrote:

“For those who care, and I understand if you don’t: Today I quit being a Christian. I’m out. I remain committed to Christ as always but not to being ‘Christian’ or to being part of Christianity. It’s simply impossible for me to ‘belong’ to this quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group. For ten years, I’ve tried. I’ve failed. I’m an outsider. My conscience will allow nothing else.”

Deservedly infamous.

Ouch!

As a forgiven, loved, and Spirit-filled people, we can do better than this.

Can’t we?

Christians certainly did at one time. Look no further than Luke’s observation about first-century Christians in the book of Acts. Their quality of life was so rich, their worship so genuine, their life together so deep, and their neighbor-love so palpable, that they “were having favor with all the people” and “the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved” (Acts 2:47). So, what went wrong? How did we end up alienating, rather than attracting, those around us?

As the sentiments noted above make crystal clear, the people of Jesus have often not represented him well, and our poor representation has created a public relations nightmare for the movement that he began through his death, burial, and resurrection. In the eyes of a watching world, our lives are more lackluster than compelling, more contentious than kind, more self-centered than servant-like, more fickle than faithful, more self-centered than generous, more proud than humble.

Rather than shining as a light to the culture, we have in many ways become products of the culture. As those whom Christ has called the light of the world, the salt of the earth, and a city on a hill, we still have a ways to go.

Our generation of Christians is not the first to limp along in its calling to live as salt and light. Since Bible times and throughout history, we have fumbled again and again. Noah’s drunkenness, Abraham’s misogyny, Jacob’s lies, Jesse’s parental neglect, Elijah’s self-pity, David’s adultery and murder, Solomon’s womanizing, Peter’s abrasiveness and cowardice, and the Corinthian church’s worldliness are only a few of the many biblical examples of stumbling saints.

Past and present history also reminds us of horrid things done in the name of Christ, but that would make the actual Christ want to turn over a table or two—Servetus burned at the stake, the Crusades, the Inquisition, the genocide of Native Americans, institutional slavery, white supremacy, signs that say “Fags Burn in Hell” raised at funerals, blind assertions that the September 11 terrorist attacks were God’s judgment on America…and more.

In his masterful exposition of The Sermon on the Mount, Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones says that Christians become a light to the world to the degree that they stand out as different from the world. The world does not thirst for a religious imitation of itself; nor does it thirst for an “us against them” moral turf war with its zealous religious neighbors. The world thirsts for a different kind of neighbor—not the kind who deny their fellowman, take up their comforts, and follow their dreams—but the kind who deny themselves, take up their crosses, and follow Jesus in his mission of loving a weary world to life. The world also thirsts for a new vision for being human, for pursuing and entering friendship, and for leaving things better than we found them.

Lloyd-Jones writes:

“The problem isn’t with Christianity as much as it is with our flawed approach to and understanding of Christianity. We have let ourselves become imbalanced, lopsided, and unfocused (much like the rigid, holier-than-thou Pharisees and the materialistic, secular Sadducees of the New Testament). To regain our footing, we need to begin following the whole Jesus and the whole Scripture, into the whole world, the whole time.”

As one who longs to see Christianity return to that place of life-giving, contagious presence in the world, I am both haunted and motivated by the characterization in Acts of the early church. That description compels me to ask what it would look like for Christians to be reignited in this kind of faith for our time?

What would it look like for us to become those who live most beautifully, love most deeply, and serve most faithfully in the places where we live, work and play?

What would it look like, as Tim Keller has said, for us to live so compellingly and lovingly in our neighborhoods, cities and nations, that if suddenly we were removed from the world, our non-believing neighbors would miss us terribly?

What would it look like for Christians to become the first place where people go for comfort when a life-altering diagnosis comes, when anxiety and depression hit, when a child goes astray, when a spouse files for divorce, or when a breadwinner loses a job?

What would it look like for a woman with a crisis pregnancy to see the local church, not the local clinic, as her trustworthy source for love, non-judgment, practical support, wise counsel, and much needed encouragement?

What would it look like for the local church to become the most diverse and welcoming—rather than the most homogeneous and inhospitable—community on earth?

What would it look like for Christians to become not only the best kinds of friends, but the best kinds of best enemies, returning insults with kindness and persecution with prayers?

What would it look like for Christians, en masse, to start loving and following the whole Jesus and the whole Scripture, the whole time, into the whole world?

Indeed, what would it look like for Gandhi sympathizers to start saying, “Your Christians are so like your Christ;” for Herb Caen to say that being born again makes people better, not worse; and for Anne Rice to want to follow Christ in the church, alongside other Christians?

Scripture declares that Christians are sent out to emanate Christ’s aroma to the world (2 Corinthians 2:15). They are carriers of his divine imprint, swept up by grace into the honored task of bringing down foretastes of heaven. He declared that we would leave the world, as far as it depended on us, better than we found it. He declared that we would be a sign and shadow of a better world, a world that all have imagined but none has yet fully seen. He declared that over time our movement—rather, His movement through us—would become irresistible to people from every nation, tribe and tongue.

The novelist and poet Madeleine L’Engle wrote:

“We draw people to Christ not by loudly discrediting what they believe, by telling them how wrong they are and how right we are, but by showing them a light that is so lovely that they want with all their hearts to know the source of it.”

In spite of a checkered past and present for the Christian family, I write this book as an optimist. I am optimistic because Jesus still intends to renew and love the world through his people. I am optimistic because the negative stories, as concerning as they are, don’t tell the full story and, therefore, shouldn’t be allowed to completely own the narrative. The negative stories aren’t the whole story because for every poor representation of Christ, there are a thousand infectiously beautiful ones. For history is also illuminated by L’Engle’s “light so lovely” and by a Christian way of life that is truly remarkable and beautiful.

History is blanketed with these kinds of lives. For example, Christians have shown groundbreaking leadership in science (Pascal, Copernicus, Newton, Galileo, Lis Meitner, Francis Collins), healthcare (all those hospitals named after a “saint”), the arts and literature (Rembrandt, , Dorothy Sayers, Dostoevsky, T.S. Eliot, Flannery O’Connor, Makoto Fujimura, Johnny Cash, Bono), the academy (all but one of the Ivy League Universities were founded by Christians), and mercy and justice (William Wilberforce, Hannah More, Dorothy Day, George Mueller, Martin Luther King, Jr.).

The identifying mark of the City of God is when citizens of the heavenly city become the very best citizens of the earthly one. As CS Lewis has said, history shows that the people who did the most for the present world were the ones who thought the most of the next one.

To be heavenly minded, then, is to be more earthly good, not less.

It is to be contagious contributors, not contemptible contrarians, to the world around us. It is to be neither holier-than-thou enemies of the culture on the one hand, nor lawless and avaricious products of the culture on the other. Rather, it is to be culture shapers for the good and flourishing of all. It is to resist every urge to lobby and position ourselves to become a power- and privilege-hungry “moral majority.” It is to pursue our God-given and biblically mandated calling to be a fiercely love-driven, self-donating, prophetic minority.

I think it’s time to embrace that vision again, don’t you?

It is heartening to see contemporary observers take note of how Christian belief, in its purest form, produces beautiful lives. New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof frequently writes of how today’s Christians outnumber the rest of the world in volunteer hours and dollars given toward the alleviation of poverty and human suffering. The gay mayor of Portland, Oregon, Sam Adams, has spoken publicly about how positive his experience was partnering with local Christian churches to serve the vulnerable communities of Portland. Here in our Nashville community, an abortion provider who is beginning to engage with the claims and ways of Christ recently told a member of our church, “I want your God, whoever he or she is, to be my God”—which appears to be his way of saying, “I like your Christ, not in spite of your Christians, but because of them.”

I don’t know about you, but this is the kind of Christianity I want to be part of, and this is the kind of Christianity I am committed to pursue. It is a beautiful and therefore truer Christianity that shines a light that is so lovely.

It is a Christianity that mirrors the whole Christ and so offers a tired and sometimes cynical world a reason to pause and consider…and to start wishing again that it could be true.

This is an adapted excerpt from Irresistible Faith by Scott Sauls. Used by permission from Thomas Nelson.


Click here to learn more about Irresistible Faith.


Click here to receive Scott’s weekly post in your email inbox.
Click here for info about Scott’s other books, plus free chapter downloads.
Click here to subscribe to Scott’s sermons on iTunes.
Connect with Scott on social media — TwitterInstagram, or Facebook.


Share

8 responses to “Toward a Better, Healthier, More Life-Giving Faith”

  1. Tom Bailey says:

    Scott, I have been getting emails from you for some time and have appreciated them even though I did not read them critically or well. This “introduction” to a whole book has attracted me toward a bookstore to purchase this latest copy from your pen. You are a light on the hills for the world and God’s people. You remind me of my dad’s vision. Keep up the good work. God bless you and please continue reading the Word of God while expressing it in the words of man. Tom Bailey

  2. greg rogers says:

    So I guess I would be one of those a little bit conflicted about the contents of this one. I agree that Christians are fools to turn faith into a sort of political battle filled with signs of hatred and disdain for anyone not on their end. On the other hand, it is clear that the most loving thing we can stand upon is the gospel of forgiveness of sin so that no man may boast and communicating this to a lost world is going to inevitably offend because sin is fun and pride is glorious to those not saved.

    And Ghandi making a claim that Jesus is unlike his followers could be a matter of this being literally true, or it could be that Ghandi’s incorrect impression of Jesus does not match the followers of the real Jesus. Since Ghandi was not a Christian, was still dead in his sin and did not have the Holy Spirit indwelling him, I would suggest that the latter is a very real possibility.

    So I hear ya-we are called to be attractors towards Jesus, but need to do so in a way true to the faith. This is exactly Apostle Paul-he wanted to fit into the culture and love people with gentleness and respect, but still called the “super apostles” like evil masquerading as angels of light who were so extreme in being relative and winsome that they abandoned gospel and biblical truth from Genesis to Revelation.

    And if the 1st century church has anything to say about how we model being a Christ follower, we should note that ultimately all of the apostles except one died via torturous murders. And the first century church was scattered amidst persecution where Christians were being burned alive for no other reason than they love Jesus more than anything else.

  3. Kevin says:

    The Bible states repeatedly that a Christ-like church will both attract and repel the culture. We will repel the culture on certain issues (e.g., abortion, sexual ethic), regardless of how carefully the Biblical position is presented. Of course, as you point out, the church can and does repel the culture for our un-Christlike behavior, and I agree those issues must be confronted head on. But the point is, the secular culture will always despise the church for both legitimate and illegitimate reasons. My fear is that this post will misleadingly encourage believers to be more accommodating and attractive to the culture on issues where the Bible demands a repellent stance.

    When confronted with an era of extreme tolerance, the temptation is to be tolerant (in order to be accepted by the dominant culture). Likewise, in an era characterized by extreme puritanism, the temptation is to be even more prudish (in order to be accepted by the dominant culture).

    Do you think our current age is characterized by extreme tolerance or puritanism?

  4. Rebecca says:

    Waiting for response to what Greg and Kevin asked…

  5. C.L. says:

    I would also welcome hearing Scott’s insight to these questions. I am dealing with this very issue in a master’s program where I walk a tolerance tightrope. Thank you!

  6. Deb says:

    Exactly what I have been feeling of late . The Church is far from its Christ . Very well written and very bold to put it out there. It needed to be said .

  7. Brian says:

    Scott,
    You accept the critic’s criticism of Christianity too easily. How does the popular phrase go … “haters gonna hate”. So, just because someone with antichristian sentiments (even if they self-identify as “christian”) thinks we’re doing it all wrong and that we’re “deservedly infamous”, that doesn’t make it truly so.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *